<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><xml><records><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="6.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Sai Krupa Das</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Edward Saltzman</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Cheryl H Gilhooly</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">James P {DeLany}</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Julie K Golden</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Anastassios G Pittas</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Gerard E Dallal</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Manjushri V Bhapkar</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Paul J Fuss</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Chhanda Dutta</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Megan A {McCrory}</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Susan B Roberts</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Low or moderate dietary energy restriction for long-term weight loss: what works best?</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Obesity</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Adult</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Basal Metabolism</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Caloric Restriction</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Energy Intake</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Energy Metabolism</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Feeding Behavior</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Female</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Humans</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Hunger</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Individuality</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Male</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Motor Activity</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Overweight</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Patient Compliance</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Pilot Projects</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Satiety Response</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Time Factors</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Treatment Outcome</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Weight Loss</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Young Adult</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2009</style></year></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19390525</style></url></web-urls></urls><number><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">11</style></number><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Silver Spring, MD</style></pub-location><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">17</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2019–2024</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Theoretical calculations suggest that small daily reductions in energy intake can cumulatively lead to substantial weight loss, but experimental data to support these calculations are lacking. We conducted a 1-year randomized controlled pilot study of low (10%) or moderate (30%) energy restriction {(ER)} with diets differing in glycemic load in 38 overweight adults (mean +/- s.d., age 35 +/- 6 years; {BMI} 27.6 +/- 1.4 kg/m(2)). Food was provided for 6 months and self-selected for 6 additional months. Measurements included body weight, resting metabolic rate {(RMR),} adherence to the {ER} prescription assessed using {(2)H(2)(18)O,} satiety, and eating behavior variables. The {10%ER} group consumed significantly less energy (by {(2)H(2)(18)O)} than prescribed over 12 months (18.1 +/- {9.8%ER,} P = 0.04), while the {30%ER} group consumed significantly more (23.1 +/- {8.7%ER,} P {\textless} 0.001). Changes in body weight, satiety, and other variables were not significantly different between groups. However, during self-selected eating (6-12 months) variability in % weight change was significantly greater in the {10%ER} group {(P} {\textless} 0.001) and poorer weight outcome on {10%ER} was predicted by higher baseline {BMI} and greater disinhibition {(P} {\textless} 0.0001; adj R(2) = 0.71). Weight loss at 12 months was not significantly different between groups prescribed 10 or {30%ER,} supporting the efficacy of low {ER} recommendations. However, long-term weight change was more variable on {10%ER} and weight change in this group was predicted by body size and eating behavior. These preliminary results indicate beneficial effects of low-level {ER} for some but not all individuals in a weight control program, and suggest testable approaches for optimizing dieting success based on individualizing prescribed level of {ER.}</style></abstract><notes><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">{PMID:} 19390525</style></notes></record></records></xml>